A missed opportunity Fanchang two times compensation rights workers wages yellow-webquest

A missed opportunity Fanchang two times compensation rights workers wages according to the Yellow River Evening News reported the employer illegal prior to the workers can get two times the wage compensation in accordance with the law, but the law does not protect the power lying in the sleeping man "- because the labor rights miss opportunity, eventually had to bear the results of losing. Recently, Fanchang County People’s court, the court concluded Digang a case like this, a warning significance. In June 7, 2014, Hwang entered a company engaged in management work, the company has not signed a labor contract with hwang. In August 3, 2015, Hwang resigned from the company. In June 21, 2016, Huang applied for labor arbitration to the labor dispute arbitration commission. After Huang refused to accept the arbitration result to court two times the salary did not sign a written labor contract require the company to pay the June 7, 2014 to August 3, 2015 period, a total of more than one hundred thousand yuan. According to China’s "Regulations" provisions of article seventh of the implementation of the labor contract law: on self employment from the employer within one year did not enter into a written labor contract workers shall, within one month to the next day a full year before a day should be in accordance with the provisions of the labor contract law article eighty-second to the employee pay two times of monthly wages, and the same day as the date of employment within one year of the workers and has a non fixed term labor contract, it shall immediately and shall conclude a written labor contract. According to the above provisions and the specific circumstances encountered Hwang, Huang has the right to obtain 11 months’ salary of two times, the specific month for July 8, 2014 to 2015 in June 6th. However, the court tried to dismiss Huang’s claim for double wages. Why is that? Originally, the court held that double wage is an additional compensation paid by the employer to the laborer in violation of the labor contract law, which is not the remuneration of labor in nature, but the punishment of the employer violating the labor contract law. Therefore, the double payment of the written labor contract should not apply to the limitation of the twenty-seventh year limitation period of the labor arbitration law of china. So the effect of the double salary claim is calculated from the second months of entry. In the case, Huang entered the job in June 7, 2014, so the arbitration time for the application of double wages was from June 7, 2015 to June 6, 2016. Huang in June 21, 2016 to the labor dispute arbitration committee for arbitration, and not the burden of existence limitation or suspension of the limitation period, the rights are not protected by law, the court will not support for Huang double wages sue.

繁昌一工人错过维权时机 两倍赔偿工资黄了   据大江晚报报道 用人单位违法在先,劳动者本可以依法获得两倍工资赔偿,但“法律不保护躺在权力上睡觉的人”――由于劳动者错过维权时机,最终不得不承受败诉的结果。近日,繁昌县人民法院荻港法庭审结了这样的一个案件,颇具警示意义。   2014年6月7日,黄某入职某公司从事管理工作,公司一直未与黄某签订劳动合同。2015年8月3日,黄某从该公司辞职。2016年6月21日,黄某向劳动争议仲裁委员会申请劳动仲裁。后黄某不服仲裁结果诉至法院,要求公司支付2014年6月7日至2015年8月3日期间未签订书面劳动合同的两倍工资,共计十万余元。   根据我国《劳动合同法实施条例》第七条规定:用人单位自用工之日起满一年未与劳动者订立书面劳动合同的,自用工之日起满一个月的次日至满一年的前一日应当依照劳动合同法第八十二条的规定向劳动者每月支付两倍的工资,并视为自用工之日起满一年的当日已经与劳动者订立无固定期限劳动合同,应当立即与劳动者补订书面劳动合同。   根据上述规定和黄某遭遇的具体情况,黄某有权获得11个月两倍工资的权利,具体月份为2014年7月8日至2015年年6月6日。然而,法院经审理却判决驳回了黄某关于双倍工资的诉讼请求。这是为何?   原来,法院审理认为,双倍工资是用人单位在违反劳动合同法的情况下向劳动者支付的额外赔偿,其在性质上不是劳动报酬,而是对用人单位违反劳动合同法的处罚。故未签订书面劳动合同双倍工资应适用我国《劳动仲裁法》第27条一年时效期的限制。所以双倍工资请求的诉讼时效应从入职第2个月开始计算。   该案中,黄某2014年6月7日入职,故其申请双倍工资的仲裁时效自2015年6月7日至2016年6月6日止。黄某2016年6月21日才向劳动争议仲裁委员会申请仲裁,且未举证在时效期间存在时效中断或中止之情形,其权利不再受法律保护,故法院对黄某双倍工资的诉请不予支持。相关的主题文章: